Introduction
The Treasurer’s Office last year released its first newsletter on property tax collection rates in Cook County, showing that an overall high collection rate for the entire county masked the perilously low rates in many financially strapped south suburbs.
One year later, the collection rate picture remains largely the
same — the county’s high collection rate has held steady at about
96%, while economically struggling communities in 15 south suburbs and west
suburban Maywood have collection rates below 85%, with five falling below 65%. That
makes it difficult to provide vital services, like police and fire protection, as
well as safe drinking water.
Collection rates on vacant land continue to hover around a low
71%, with taxes on thousands of those properties going unpaid year after year.
Still, a more granular analysis of Treasurer’s Office
data reveals a slightly lower collection rate on residential properties
compared to last year, and significant collection rate increases and decreases
in several Cook County suburbs and Chicago community areas.
Background
The Treasurer's Office bills and
collects property taxes for all local taxing districts in Cook County. For the
2022 tax year, which was billed in 2023, those districts sought a total of
$17.6 billion from owners of nearly 1.8 million properties. Bills were mailed
in late October 2023, with a due date of Dec. 1, 2023.
The office analyzed how much money
was collected 31 days after bills were due. It compared those collections to those
from previous years at the same point in the collection cycle.
Historical trends indicate the
collection rates are likely to rise until they peak at about 99% during the Annual
Tax Sale, which can lead to the loss of one's property. That sale is held about
13 months after bills are past due.
An analysis of Treasurer’s Office data from tax year
2017 to tax year 2021 shows the threat of a tax sale motivates property owners
to pay.
During the 11 months following the 31 days-past-due mark, between
2.2% and 2.8% more of the total amount due was collected. In the month before
the sale, between 0.06% and 0.27% was collected, and during the sale, tax buyers
paid between 0.23% and 0.43% of the total amount owed. After that, even smaller
fractions of what’s still owed trickle in.
View the Data
Use the data dashboard to find
collection rates for Cook County municipalities, Chicago wards and community
areas, and county taxing agencies for the 2022 tax year 31 days after payments
were due.
Countywide
As of Jan. 1, 2024, the county collected 96.08% of property
taxes billed for tax year 2022.
That collection rate is in line with those of the previous
four years, when they ranged from 95.7% to 96.3% (Table 1).
Table 1: Countywide Collection Rates 31 Days After Due
Date
|
Tax Year
|
Amount Billed
|
Amount Collected
|
Collection Rate
|
2018
|
$14.94 Billion
|
$14.34 Billion
|
96.01%
|
2019
|
$15.56 Billion
|
$14.94 Billion
|
96.02%
|
2020
|
$16.10 Billion
|
$15.40 Billion
|
95.67%
|
2021
|
$16.71 Billion
|
$16.10 Billion
|
96.29%
|
2022
|
$17.62 Billion
|
$16.93 Billion
|
96.08%
|
Collection rates increase by a couple of percentage points from
the time they are due until the tax sale is held. The countywide rates for
prior years currently stand at more than 99%. Because some downward tax bill
adjustments result from appeals after bills are mailed, the collection rate for
the original amount billed will never reach 100%, even if all property owners paid
their taxes.
Tax year 2022 collection rates for most types of property
— including commercial and industrial properties, apartment buildings, condominiums
and single-family homes — were 95% or higher. The exception was vacant
land, which had a collection rate of 71.3%.
Currently, the owners of about 25,000 vacant lots have made
no payments in tax year 2022 — more than one third of vacant lots in the
county. Most of these lots are chronically tax delinquent. Nine out of 10 have
been offered at multiple tax sales in the past decade, and more than half
appeared in the 2022 Scavenger Sale of properties with delinquencies in at
least three of the last 20 years. About 70% have been classified as vacant lots
for 20 years or more.
Countywide, the low collections on vacant land has little
effect on the collection rate, because the total amount billed on those vacant
parcels throughout the county was less than $122 million — about 0.7% of
the total $17.6 billion owed. However, that low collection rate has a larger
impact on some smaller south suburbs with large swaths of vacant land. In Ford
Heights, nearly 25% of the total $4.3 million tax tab was billed on vacant
land, and only 9.3% of that was paid.
Collection rates for the 2022 tax year varied by less than 1%
for most types of property from tax year 2021. The collection rate on residential
properties decreased by 0.53%, while the collection rate on commercial and
industrial properties slightly increased (Table 2).
Although the residential collection rate fell only by one-half
percent, the total amount owed increased by $80 million.
Table 2: Tax Year 2022 Collection Rates by Property Class 31
Days after Due Date
|
Major Class
|
Taxable Properties
|
Amount Billed
|
Amount Collected
|
Collection Rate
|
Collection Rate % Change from 2021
|
Class 1 -
Vacant
|
63,649
|
$121,810,594
|
$86,873,652
|
71.32%
|
-0.30%
|
Class 2 -
Residential
|
1,590,145
|
$9,837,370,338
|
$9,471,351,408
|
96.28%
|
-0.53%
|
Class 3 -
Multi-Family Residential
|
20,080
|
$1,049,206,768
|
$1,029,344,073
|
98.11%
|
-0.01%
|
Class 4 -
Not-for-Profit
|
443
|
$24,357,096
|
$23,605,866
|
96.92%
|
-0.91%
|
Class 5 -
Commercial/Industrial
|
91,819
|
$6,152,389,640
|
$5,880,554,674
|
95.58%
|
0.03%
|
Class 6 -
Industrial Incentive
|
2,345
|
$250,118,408
|
$249,031,880
|
99.57%
|
0.36%
|
Class 7 -
Commercial Incentive
|
329
|
$69,994,729
|
$69,985,568
|
99.99%
|
-0.10%
|
Class 8 -
Comm./Industrial Incentive
|
1,733
|
$92,435,396
|
$94,588,336
|
102.33%*
|
6.27%
|
Class 9 -
Multi-Family Incentive
|
989
|
$23,905,046
|
$24,497,491
|
102.48%*
|
2.53%
|
*In some property
classes, more taxes were paid than billed in 2022. Property owners overpaid
their taxes that had not yet been refunded as of Jan. 1, 2024.
Collections by Region
Cook County is divided into three regions for property tax
assessments, with each region being completely reassessed every three years.
The regions comprise the city of Chicago, all suburbs north of North Avenue and
all suburbs south of North Avenue. All three regions saw a slight decrease in
collection rates from 2021 to 2022 (Table 3).
Table 3: Tax Year 2022 Collection Rates by Region 31 Days after
Due Date
|
Triennial
|
Taxable Properties
|
Amount Billed
|
Amount Collected
|
Collection Rate
|
Collection Rate % Change from 2021
|
City
|
833,531
|
$8,119,718,926
|
$7,833,145,851
|
96.47%
|
-0.36%
|
North
|
441,863
|
$5,391,937,843
|
$5,273,653,310
|
97.81%
|
-0.09%
|
South
|
496,138
|
$4,109,931,247
|
$3,824,540,711
|
93.06%
|
-0.15%
|
Property owners in the north suburbs, which were reassessed
for Tax Year 2022, paid 97.81% of the taxes they owed, the highest rate among
the three regions. This overall collection rate is about one tenth of a percent
less than last year. The collection rate on residential properties, which had a
median bill increase of 15.7%, dropped 0.6% from tax year 2021 to 97.5%. The
collection rate for commercial and industrial properties increased by 0.8% to 98%.
The collection rate in the south suburbs fell by 0.15% to
93.06%, which remains the lowest among the three regions. The collection rate
on the region’s 22,500 vacant lots was 56.1%. The south suburbs were
reassessed for tax year 2023, which will be billed in 2024.
In Chicago, collection rates fell by 0.4% to 96.47%. Residential
collection rates fell 0.7% to 96%, and the collection rate on vacant lots
decreased by 0.5% to 75.8%.
Chicago Regions
Collection rates within the city varied greatly by region
and community area.
Collection rates on the West and Southwest Sides increased, by 0.5% and 0.3%
respectively. Collection rates on the South Side decreased by more than 2% from
the previous tax year (Table 4). The falling collection rates in some South
Side community areas exacerbate what are already the lowest rates in the city.
Table 4: Chicago Community Region Tax Year 2022 Collection
Rates
|
Community Region
|
Taxable Properties
|
Amount Billed
|
Amount Collected
(31 days after due)
|
Collection Rate
(31 days after due)
|
Collection Rate % Change from 2021
|
West
Chicago
|
129,372
|
$1,440,576,371
|
$1,382,289,209
|
95.95%
|
0.53%
|
Southwest
Chicago
|
104,411
|
$493,556,923
|
$471,650,963
|
95.56%
|
0.34%
|
Central Chicago
|
116,352
|
$2,831,859,803
|
$2,772,087,727
|
97.89%
|
-0.28%
|
Northwest
Chicago
|
148,403
|
$1,185,373,427
|
$1,147,299,318
|
96.79%
|
-0.68%
|
North
Chicago
|
148,192
|
$1,551,444,365
|
$1,506,821,064
|
97.12%
|
-0.68%
|
South
Chicago
|
91,426
|
$353,415,132
|
$313,643,204
|
88.75%
|
-2.02%
|
Far South
Chicago
|
95,375
|
$263,492,905
|
$239,354,366
|
90.84%
|
-2.12%
|
Chicago Community Areas
Seven of Chicago’s 77 community areas saw an increase
of at least 1%. Most were on the West and Southwest Sides, while Fuller Park,
one of the city’s smallest community areas, also had a significant
collection rate increase (Table 5).
Table 5: Top Chicago Community Area Tax Year 2022 Collection
Rate Increases
|
Community Area
|
Taxable Properties
|
Amount Billed
|
Amount Collected
(31 days after due)
|
Collection Rate
(31 days after due)
|
Collection Rate % Change from 2021
|
Fuller
Park
|
1,210
|
$2,843,615
|
$2,416,580.86
|
84.98%
|
10.09%
|
East
Garfield Park
|
5,441
|
$21,649,394
|
$19,908,915.15
|
91.96%
|
3.16%
|
South
Lawndale
|
10,488
|
$54,976,404
|
$51,819,714
|
94.26%
|
2.22%
|
Brighton
Park
|
8,614
|
$42,013,565
|
$40,055,260
|
95.34%
|
2.05%
|
North
Lawndale
|
8,029
|
$29,848,194
|
$26,097,047
|
87.43%
|
1.93%
|
McKinley
Park
|
4,275
|
$31,699,452
|
$30,623,469
|
96.61%
|
1.89%
|
New City
|
11,501
|
$51,512,465
|
$47,920,163
|
93.03%
|
1.39%
|
West
Elsdon
|
4,860
|
$18,686,156
|
$18,200,695
|
97.40%
|
1.29%
|
Higher collection rates on commercial and industrial
properties helped spur the increases in these communities. In each of the
communities with the highest collection rate increases, commercial and
industrial collections ticked up by at least 2.4%.
Collection rates fell by more than 1% from the previous year
in 28 community areas and more than 3.5% in 12 of them (Table 6). The largest
drops occurred on the South Side.
Table 6: Top Chicago Community Area Tax Year 2022 Collection
Rate Decreases
|
Community Area
|
Taxable Properties
|
Amount Billed
|
Amount Collected
(31 days after due)
|
Collection Rate
(31 days after due)
|
Collection Rate % Change from 2021
|
West
Pullman
|
11,212
|
$14,822,610
|
$12,018,775
|
81.08%
|
-8.35%
|
Greater
Grand Crossing
|
8,300
|
$25,139,399
|
$21,125,402
|
84.03%
|
-7.11%
|
West
Englewood
|
11,395
|
$12,533,571
|
$9,151,219
|
73.01%
|
-6.74%
|
Englewood
|
8,689
|
$12,834,940
|
$9,131,916
|
71.15%
|
-5.65%
|
South
Chicago
|
8,325
|
$17,700,750
|
$14,704,360
|
83.07%
|
-4.93%
|
West
Garfield Park
|
4,352
|
$14,490,704
|
$10,528,046
|
72.65%
|
-4.86%
|
Riverdale
|
863
|
$3,230,344
|
$2,420,037
|
74.92%
|
-4.84%
|
Near
South Side
|
21,911
|
$166,075,062
|
$155,339,002
|
93.54%
|
-4.27%
|
Washington
Park
|
2,312
|
$10,631,709
|
$8,484,864
|
79.81%
|
-3.97%
|
Burnside
|
1,114
|
$4,473,384
|
$4,076,363
|
91.12%
|
-3.77%
|
South
Deering
|
6,258
|
$17,087,172
|
$15,153,643
|
88.68%
|
-3.66%
|
Oakland
|
1,346
|
$7,315,632
|
$6,651,420
|
90.92%
|
-3.62%
|
Most of these communities have one thing in common: their
residential tax base is shrinking. Nine of the 12 communities with the lowest
collection rates had fewer residential properties in tax year 2022, and the
collection rate on residential properties dropped in 11 out of the 12
communities.
Municipalities
The collection rate in most municipalities remained
consistent in tax year 2022, increasing or decreasing by less than 1% from the
previous year. Several suburbs saw significant collection rate increases; conversely,
collection rates in some suburbs fell substantially.
Collection rates in nine of the county’s 135
municipalities increased by more than 2% in tax year 2022. Several of these
municipalities were south suburban communities with historically low collection
rates (Table 7).
Table 7: Municipalities with the Highest Collection Rate
Increases
|
Municipality
|
Taxable Properties
|
Amount Billed
|
Amount Collected
(31 days after due)
|
Collection Rate
(31 days after due)
|
Collection Rate % Change from 2021
|
Phoenix
|
1,303
|
$2,712,609
|
$1,606,185
|
59.21%
|
12.99%
|
Country
Club Hills
|
6,187
|
$51,275,918
|
$49,769,955
|
97.06%
|
9.83%
|
Markham
|
7,502
|
$56,217,881
|
$46,589,503
|
82.87%
|
9.09%
|
Robbins
|
4,002
|
$7,466,181
|
$3,926,390
|
52.59%
|
3.70%
|
Stickney
|
2,350
|
$17,829,434
|
$16,523,222
|
92.67%
|
2.89%
|
Hoffman
Estates
|
17,393
|
$189,145,550
|
$187,023,731
|
98.88%
|
2.83%
|
Elgin
|
7,585
|
$52,848,879
|
$51,764,936
|
97.95%
|
2.33%
|
Calumet
Park
|
2,967
|
$15,471,084
|
$12,085,734
|
78.12%
|
2.07%
|
Thornton
|
1,204
|
$10,925,262
|
$9,956,637
|
91.13%
|
2.05%
|
In Markham and Country Club Hills, new, large developments
helped increase the overall collection rate. Amazon opened a
distribution
center
on once-vacant land in Markham in 2022, which fueled a $20
million increase in taxes billed to commercial/industrial incentive properties.
In Country Club Hills, the 1 million-square-foot
Cubes
development
contributed to the jump in collections.
Phoenix, which had the highest collection rate increase, is
a village with only 1,300 taxable properties. Increased payments from a handful
of properties were enough to lift the collection rate on commercial and
industrial properties by nearly 75%, bumping the community’s low
collection rate considerably.
Collection rates for seven municipalities fell by more than 2%
in tax year 2022.The highest decreases occurred in the south suburbs (Table 8).
Table 8: Municipalities with the Highest Collection Rate
Decreases
|
Municipality
|
Taxable Properties
|
Amount Billed
|
Amount Collected
(31 days after due)
|
Collection Rate
(31 days after due)
|
Collection Rate % Change from 2021
|
Olympia
Fields
|
2,129
|
$25,013,482
|
$22,106,233
|
88.38%
|
-5.53%
|
Glenwood
|
3,625
|
$23,724,544
|
$21,426,814
|
90.31%
|
-4.57%
|
East
Hazel Crest
|
558
|
$4,721,742
|
$4,324,771
|
91.59%
|
-3.90%
|
Ford
Heights
|
1,588
|
$4,281,196
|
$1,222,427
|
28.55%
|
-3.25%
|
Hillside
|
3,233
|
$37,788,253
|
$35,839,501
|
94.84%
|
-2.42%
|
Berkeley
|
1,897
|
$16,394,007
|
$15,535,834
|
94.77%
|
-2.13%
|
Forest
Park
|
5,696
|
$50,045,175
|
$47,832,594
|
95.58%
|
-2.11%
|
School Districts
For this year’s analysis, the Treasurer’s Office
calculated collection rates for each separate taxing district, including every school
district. District boundaries often extend across multiple suburbs.
Most school districts saw collection rates rise or fall within
one percent, but outliers exist, particularly in elementary schools.
Among elementary school districts, South Holland School District
150 had the largest collection rate decrease, collecting 89.26% of taxes it billed,
3.14% less than last year. Central Stickney School District 110, Dolton School
District 149, Hazel Crest School District 152 1/2 and Morton Grove School
District 70 also saw collection rates fall by 2% or more (Table 9).
Table 9: Top Elementary School District Tax Year 2022 Collection
Rate Decreases
|
District Name
|
Taxable Properties
|
Amount Billed
|
Amount Collected
(31 days after due)
|
Collection Rate
(31 days after due)
|
Collection Rate % Change from 2021
|
School
District 150
|
4,180
|
$9,569,354
|
$8,542,018
|
89.26%
|
-3.14%
|
School
District 110
|
1,551
|
$5,259,332
|
$4,978,743
|
94.66%
|
-2.89%
|
School
District 149
|
9,473
|
$17,331,384
|
$14,706,159
|
84.85%
|
-2.45%
|
School
District 152 1/2
|
4,117
|
$7,242,165
|
$5,486,092
|
75.75%
|
-2.40%
|
School
District 70
|
4,561
|
$13,827,112
|
$13,353,276
|
96.57%
|
-2.05%
|
At the same time, five elementary school districts saw
increases of 2% or more. Calumet Public School District 132 saw a 4.1% rise in its
collection rate, but that rate still remains low at 78.7%. West Northfield
School District 31, Community Consolidated School District 168 in Sauk Village,
Sunnybrook School District 171 in Lansing and Burnham School District 154
½ also saw a 2% or more improvement.
Three high school districts had a collection rate decrease
of 1% or more — Community High School District 231 in Evergreen Park,
Thornton Township High School District 205 and Homewood-Flossmoor Community High
School District 230. Thornton Township High School District 205’s
collection rate of 78.6% remains lowest among high school districts.
Among consolidated school districts, which comprise both
elementary, middle and high schools, Barrington Community Unit School District
220 and Community Unit School District 300 in northwest Cook County saw
collection rate increases of more than 2% compared to last year.
Other Taxing Agencies
Taxing agencies typically have collection rates that mirror the
overall rate in the communities where they are located – taxing agencies
in a municipality with a low collection rate will have a low collection rate,
and vice versa. For example, Homewood Public Library District collected a relatively
healthy 92.86% of its taxes, just a slight difference from the 93.11% collection
rate for all taxes billed in the village of Homewood. Conversely, Harvey Elementary
School District 152 collected just 52.91% of its taxes, nearly mirroring a
51.68% collection rate for all taxing agencies in the city of Harvey.
Smaller agencies, such as Special Service Areas and Tax Increment
Financing districts, may have highly variable collection rates year to year, as
even a single property that does or does not pay can impact
collection rates. On the other hand, larger taxing agencies typically have more
stable collection rates.
The data dashboard above contains collection rate data for
every taxing agency Cook County taxpayers see on their tax bills.
The 31-day collection rates reflect the amount of money collected for each taxing
district in the county, minus the amount refunded for various reasons,
including bounced checks, duplicate payments and overpayments.
— Christopher Silber, Treasurer’s Research Team
Published: Feb. 14,
2024